Category Archives: Movie Reviews

Reviews of movies I have seen.

A Day in the Country (1936)

A Day in the Country (“Partie de campagne”) 
Directed by Jean Renoir
Written by Jean Renoir based on a short story by Guy de Maupassant
1936/France
Panthéon Productions

First viewing
#94 of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die

 

[box] “The kiss itself is immortal. It travels from lip to lip, century to century, from age to age. Men and women garner these kisses, offer them to others and then die in turn.” ― Guy de Maupassant, The Complete Short Stories of Guy de Maupassant, Part One[/box]

Jean Renoir’s third film of 1936 is an unfinished jewel that makes up in atmosphere and emotion what it lacks in characterization and story.

The Dufours are Parisian dairy owners.  Father, mother, daughter and shop boy take an annual trip to the country one Sunday where they stop at a riverside inn for lunch. Henrietta, the daughter, is enchanted by the beauty of the setting, which awakens in her an inexpressible tenderness.  Two young men are also dining at the inn.  After lunch, they provide the father and shop assistant with fishing poles and offer to take the ladies rowing.  Henri takes Henrietta to his secret grove of trees where they kiss.  With Jean Renoir in a small part as the owner of the inn.

Renoir evokes the essence of a lazy summer day with his camerawork, which is just gorgeous.  The music, too, reflects the fullness in Henrietta’s heart.  In fact, the whole ambience has the feeling of Renoir’s father the impressionist painter.  I imagine it was for this reason that the film was selected for The List.  Otherwise, I don’t understand why one of the other two excellent 1936 films, The Crime of Monsieur Lange or The Lower Depths were not chosen.  Those reflect completed work and are far more substantial than this one, which is a little farcical in the early parts for my taste.

Clip

Our Relations (1936)

Our Relations
Directed by Harry Lachman
Written by Richard Connell, Felix Adler, et al
1936/USA
Hal Roach Studios/Metro-Goldwyn-Meyer
First viewing

 

[box] Finn: [hands Ollie a bill] Here, have yourselves a fling. Ollie: A dollar? We can’t do much flinging on a dollar.[/box]

I found most of this uninspired until the very end when a sight gag involving Stan and Ollie bobbing around like roly-poly dolls with their feet in cement had me roaring  with laughter.

Stan and Ollie’s long-lost twin brothers Alf and Bertie are sailors.  Unbeknownst to our heroes they show up penniless in town and set in motion all kinds of nonsense involving mistaken identities and a valuable ringing belonging to the captain of the ship.  With Alan Hale as a beer-garden owner.

Clip

The Story of Louis Pasteur

The Story of Louis Pasteur
Directed by William Dieterle
Written by Sheridan Gibney and Pierre Collings
1936/USA
First National Productions

First viewing

 

[box] Dr. Louis Pasteur: [to his assistants] Remember our aim: Find the microbe – kill the microbe.[/box]

I enjoyed this inspiring biopic and Paul Muni’s perfomance as the French scientist.

Irascible French chemist Louis Pasteur fights for years to have his theory that microbes cause disease accepted by the French medical establishment.  His theory helps him to discover a vaccine for anthrax and a cure for rabies.

Despite the dry sounding subject matter, my eyes were wet by the end.  It is amazing how helpless medicine was against disease and how vulnerable people were to infection by dirty hands and instruments before Pasteur’s breakthrough (which, admittedly was paralleled by Lister’s work on antiseptic surgery in Britain).  Muni absolutely disappears into his character.  Recommended.

Muni won an Academy Award for Best Actor, while Collings and Gibney won for Best Screenplay and Best Story. The film was nominated for Best Picture.

Trailer

 

Reefer Madness (1936)

Reefer Madness (AKA “Tell Your Children”, “The Burning Question”, “Dope Addict”, “Doped Youth” and “Love Madness”)
Directed by Louis J. Gasnier
Written by Arthur Hoerl from an original story by Lawrence Meade
1936/USA
George A. Hirliman Productions

First viewing

 

[box] Bureau Official: Here is an example: A fifteen-year-old lad apprehended in the act of staging a holdup – fifteen years old and a marijuana addict. Here is a most tragic case.

Dr. Carroll: Yes. I remember. Just a young boy… under the influence of drugs… who killed his entire family with an axe.[/box]

The second in my series of roadshow attractions from 1936 and another exploitation film that masquerades under the guise of raising public awareness on the perils of the evil weed.

In this one, Mary, Bill, and Jimmy are happy well-adjusted teenagers until Jimmy accepts Jack’s invitation to a party.  One by one they are picked off by innocently accepting cigarettes offered by their friends … cigarettes that immediately start them laughing maniacally.  After the victims become hopeless addicts, the inevitable slide to attempted rape, hit-and-run driving, murder, frame-up, and suicide begins.

This one is not quite so salacious as Marihuana but was surely scandalous for its time. The acting is priceless.  This film gained cult status in the 70’s when NORML showed it as a midnight movie to raise funds for its marijuana legalization efforts.

Original Trailer

Marihuana (1936)

Marihuana (AKA “Marihuana, the Devil’s Weed”; “Marihuana, the Weed with Roots in Hell!”)
Directed by Dwain Esper
Written by Hildegarde Stadie
1936/USA
Roadshow Attractions

First viewing

 

 

[box] Teenaged boy: [pouring a drink] This is gonna be a slippery drink for sliding girls.[/box]

Unhampered by the Hayes Code, the filmmakers disguise a lot of naughty goings on (nude bathing!) in a supposedly anti-drug tract.

This tells the tragic story of Burma, as she falls, courtesy of a funny-looking cigarette, from sulky teenager to heartless heroin pusher.  Meanwhile, we get wild dancing at a beer joint, disrobing at a weenie roast, and gangland violence.  Twenty-something 30’s “teenagers” look and act strangely similar to twenty-something 50’s “teenagers”.

Except for Burma’s hilarious performance in the finale, this was not as funny as I had hoped.  Then again, I was not stoned at the time.  I have high hopes for Reefer Madness, which I will review later today.

Trailer

 

The Texas Rangers (1936)

The Texas Rangers
Directed by King Vidor
Screenplay by Louis Stevens; story by King Vidor and Elizabeth Hill
1936/USA
Paramount Pictures

First viewing

 

[box] Wahoo Jones: Looks like you got me, Sam, but I’ll lay my cards on the table. I’ll shoot straight.

Sam McGee: [shooting Wahoo under the table] So will I.[/box]

This is an entertaining western from an “A” team at Paramount.

Jim Hawkins (Fred MacMurray), ‘Wahoo’ Jones (Jack Oakie), and Sam McGee (Lloyd Nolan) are a gang of friends who run a con setting up stage-coach robberies.  Jim and Wahoo get split off from Sam and head off to Texas to find him.  There they discover that their old con won’t work due to the vigilance of the Texas Rangers. Figuring they can’t beat ’em, Jim and Wahoo join up.  They figure they may get inside info that will allow them to pull off some jobs.  But as time goes on, they begin to make friends within the force.  Will they be able to switch sides when opportunity calls?  With Jean Parker as the love interest.

I thought this was an OK way to spend an afternoon. I always enjoy Jack Oakie – his turn as Napolini is one of my favorite parts of The Great Dictator – and he is good here.

Micro clip

 

Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977)

Close Encounters of the Third Kindclose encounters poster
Directed by Stephen Spielberg
Written by Stephen Spielberg
1977/USA
Columbia Pictures Corporation/EMI Films/Julia Phillips and Michael Phillips Productions

Repeat viewing
#618 of 1001 Films You Must See Before You Die
IMDb users say 7.7/10; I say 9.5/10

 

[box] Barry Guiler: You can come and play now.[/box]

What better way to get back into the swing of my “must-see” movie viewing than with this practically perfect science fiction/fantasy?  This would have received full points from me if the aliens had been left a mystery at the end.

I have always preferred this film to Star Wars, which came out the same year.  The plot of Star Wars could have, and had, taken place in the Old West, medieval Japan, or a fairy-tale kingdom – anywhere, indeed, where good guys fought bad guys.  Close Encounters only works as a collision of every day reality with the Unknown.  The audience can identify with the befuddled everymen and share their sense of wonder.

I love the delight of tiny Barry Guiler when an unseen delegation from a UFO marches through his house like a whirlwind.  And I can only sympathize with Roy Neary (Richard Dreyfuss) and his entire family as a force no one can understand takes over his will and life.

close-encounters-of-the-third-kind 1

That is why I would have preferred to have let my imagination create aliens wonderful enough to create this kind of awe.  I don’t think any kind of physical representation could have done the trick.  As it is, the aliens look all too much like E.T.   I was amused, however, at a shot that clearly shows the resemblance between big-eyed toddler Cary Guffey as Barry and the faces of the smaller aliens.

But this is nitpicking.  Until the end, I was totally engrossed in the story, which has held up admirably all these years later.

Original Trailer

Satan Met a Lady (1936)

Satan Met a Lady
Directed by William Dieterle
Written by Brown Holmes based on a novel by Dashiell Hammett
1936/USA
Warner Bros.

First viewing

 

[box] Valerie Purvis: Do you mind very much, Mr. Shane, taking off your hat in the presence of a lady with a gun?[/box]

This is an adaptation of The Maltese Falcon with all the character names changed and the quarry changed to a medieval ram’s horn stuffed with jewels.  It’s all played for laughs.  I will identify the cast by their Maltese Falcon names:  Warren William as Sam Spade; Bette Davis as Ruth Wonderly/Bridget O’Shaughnessy; Arthur Treacher as Joel Cairo; Allison Skipworth as Kasper Gutman; Maynard Holmes as Wilbur; and Porter Hall as Miles Archer.

I thought this was pretty bad.  Warren William seems to be laughing at his own little joke the entire time.  The whole thing is really very silly.  This is the kind of thing Bette Davis was probably fighting to stay out of at Warners.

Trailer

 

 

Mary of Scotland (1936)

Mary of Scotland
Directed by John Ford and Leslie Godwins (uncredited)
Written by Dudley Nichols from the play by Maxwell Anderson
1936/USA
RKO Radio Pictures

First viewing

 

[box] Mary, Queen of Scots: I have loved as a woman loves, lost as a woman loses… My son shall sit on the throne! My son shall rule England! Still, still, I win![/box]

For some reason I just couldn’t get into this film despite its fine production values.

Katharine Hepburn plays Mary, heir to the throne of England, who returns to Scotland from France at the beginning of the film.  She is immediately confronted by the hostility of the Lairds that have been ruling Scotland in her absence and Presbyterian firebrand John Knox and the emnity of Elizabeth I.  Her one champion is Bothwell (Fredric March) and they fall in love.  However, she is more or less forced to marry Darnley, who is second in line to the English throne, to solidify her claims.  Things do not turn out well for anyone concerned.  Well, maybe eventually for baby James.

 

This was based on a stage play and while the filmmaking is quite cinematic the dialogue remains stagebound and flowery.  I thought Hepburn’s performance was uneven.  She often overdid it but then would be radiant once more.  I thought Florence Eldridge was perfectly awful as Elizabeth.  I have to admit that the film is beautiful to look at.  John Ford got a “Special Recommendation” for this at the Venice Film Festival.

For TCM clips go here:  http://www.tcm.com/mediaroom/video/208648/Mary-of-Scotland-Movie-Clip-Another-Sovereign.html

 

Rembrandt (1936)

RembrandtRembrandt Poster
Directed by Alexander Korda
Written by Carl Zuckmayer, June Head, and Lajos Biró
1936/UK
London Film Productions

Repeat viewing

 

Rembrandt van Rijn: What is success? A soldier can reckon his success in victories, a merchant in money. But my world is insubstantial. I live in a beautiful, blinding, swirling mist.

This is a very good biography of the painter with a fine performance by Charles Laughton and beautiful costumes and art direction.

The story follows Rembrandt from about the time he lost his beloved wife Saska after his “The Night Watch” met with ridicule.  We see Rembrandt struggle with poverty and a nagging mistress (Gertrude Lawrence) while he continues to pursue a vision that few share.  He finds contentment toward the end of his life despite bankruptcy through the love and inspiration of former scullery maid Hendrickje (Elsa Lancaster).

Rembrandt 1

Charles Laughton is convincing as Rembrandt.  In the course of portraying the painter, he also has the opportunity to movingly read some selections from the Bible.  But the real star for me was the production design.  The settings, lighting, and costumes call to mind not only several Rembrandt masterpieces but works of other Dutch Masters such as Brueghel and Vermeer.  Recommended.

TV promo