Picnic at Hanging Rock (1975)

Picnic at Hanging Rock
Directed by Peter Weir
Written by Cliff Green from a novel by Joan Lindsay
1975/Australia
Repeat viewing/Criterion Channel
One of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die

Michael Fitzhubert: I wake up every night in a cold sweat just wondering if they’re still alive.
Albert Crundall: Yeah, well the way I look at it is this: if the bloody cop, and the bloody Abo tracker, and the bloody dog can’t find them, well no one bloody can.

I have tried to love this gorgeous, well-acted film. But there’s only so much dreamy, romantic, schoolgirl lethargy that I can take.

It is February 14, 1900, somewhere in rural South Australia at a girl’s boarding school, Appleyard College.  It begins with the girls changing from their white nightgowns to their white dresses.  They tend to each other lovingly.  Miranda’s doting roommate Sara has written her a love poem.  Miranda warns Sara that she should find someone else to love as Miranda will not be around too much longer.

As a special Valentine’s treat, the girls and most of the teachers are going on a picnic near the “Hanging Rock”.  Mrs. Appleyard (Rachel Roberts) has taken a dislike to the defiant Sara- mostly because her fees have not been paid – and forbids her from joining her classmates.

All of the girls are dressed in billowy white with gloves, corsets, etc, hardly mountaineering attire.  They are warned that the rock is extremely dangerous and is inhabited by venomous snakes and poisonous ants.  Everyone’s timepiece stops at 12 noon when they arrive at the site.  The girls spend the afternoon lounging and sleeping.  Near the end of the appointed time Miranda, Irma and Marion get permission to climb the rock a short distance.  The fat whiny Edith is allowed to tag along.  Then teacher Miss McGraw starts climbing the mountain.  The girls are spotted by Michael Fitzhubert, a young English aristocrat as he is on a stroll of his own.  He follows for a bit but turns around.

Edith returns screaming from the mountain after the other three girls ignore her pleas not to enter an interior recess.  The class arrives back to the school hours late.  The coachman reports that Miranda, Irma, Marion and, Miss McGraw never returned from the Hanging Rock and a search failed to locate them.

Michael is obsessed with locating Miranda and searches independently with his valet Bertie.  On the last search expedition Michael spends the night alone on the rock.  When Bertie comes looking for him the next day, he finds him battered and delirious.  Bertie finds an unconscious Irma by following Michael’s trail.  Irma  doesn’t remember anything of what happened.

None of the other girls or Miss McGraw is ever located.  Their disappearance looks likely to destroy the school.  A couple of other vaguely mysterious deaths follow.

The gorgeous imagery just isn’t enough in this case, not for me anyway.  I read somewhere that it is considered a “horror” film.  So this time around, I tried to view it in that context.  I failed to see anything horrifying about it.  The film does have some good points to make about the futility of trying to living up to Victorian manners and values in a wilderness.  I’m sure somebody could make a compelling movie about an unsolved mystery but the endless drippy pronouncements of sleepy adolescents just get on my nerves.  I know I am in the minority on this and it is probably worth seeing once.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dfordoom
dfordoom
4 years ago

The author of the book on which the film is based was obsessed with time so it’s possibly a science fiction film rather than a horror film. It may in fact be a kind of time-travel film. It’s not a question of where the girls have gone, but when.

It’s definitely a style-over-substance film. Like most of the “official” government-subsidised Australian movies of its era it’s a bit too arty for its own good. The much more overtly commercial ozploitation movies of that era tend to be more entertaining.

At least it’s better than MY BRILLIANT CAREER.

dfordoom
dfordoom
4 years ago
Reply to  Bea

“I have Sunday Too Far Away as a possibility for 1975. Is it any good?”

I didn’t like it at all. It’s typical of the government-subsidised Australian films of the era. Very political, lots of stuff about working-class struggle plus lots of male bonding. The film school crowd loved it at the time. I tend to dislike films that the film school crowd likes!

When you get to 1977 an Australian movie to avoid is Peter Weir’s THE LAST WAVE. Much more boring than PICNIC AT HANGING ROCK but without any of PICNIC’s good points. It’s similar thematically to PICNIC – lots of stuff about the spirituality of the landscape. It’s another one that the film school crowd loved.

I’m not a fan of Australian movies in general, apart from ozploitation movies of the 70s and 80s.

dfordoom
dfordoom
4 years ago
Reply to  Bea

I’m glad I’m not the only one who hated THE LAST WAVE.

I’m not the biggest Peter Weir fan. Although I do admit to having loved MASTER AND COMMANDER, which I expected to hate.

Hoosier X
Hoosier X
4 years ago

I liked Gallipoli a lot!

Dead Poets Society … I saw it … I’m trying to remember why I didn’t like it much.

dfordoom
dfordoom
4 years ago

I hated DEAD POET’S SOCIETY as well!

dfordoom
dfordoom
4 years ago
Reply to  Bea

Three for three. It’s so psuedo-profound.

Maybe that’s why MASTER AND COMMANDER is the only Weir film I’ve really loved. Given the type of film it is he couldn’t get away with too much meandering pseudo-profundity. He had to include plenty of excitement and entertainment and I think that kept his arty-intellectualism under some sort of control.

Arty-intellectualism is one of the reasons I dislike the government-subsidised Australian films. I think that if you have the government subsidising movies you’re going to end up with pseudo-profoundity and arty-intellectualism. That’s why I prefer the commercially oriented ozploitation movies – they’re often sleazy and sometimes violent but at least they had to be entertaining. And sometimes they managed to be quite clever as well (THIRST being a good example).