Daily Archives: March 31, 2013

Make Way for Tomorrow (1937)

Make Way for Tomorrowmakewayfortomorrow-2009criteriondvd
Directed by Leo McCarey
1937/USA
Paramount Pictures

#109 of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die
First Viewing

 

I watched this as a companion piece to Ozu’s Tokyo Story, with which it is thematically linked.  Both films deal with relations between parents and their adult children.  This film confronts the issue more directly as the children are faced with having to care for their parents in old age.  It is also one of the few films to portray married love in the sunset of life.  Although it is a more sentimental story, it is also an excellent film.

Make Way for Tomorrow 3

The children are stunned at the news that the parents have to leave their home in two days.

Lucy and Barkley Cooper have been happily married for 50 years when the bank forecloses on their home. Since none of their five children is willing to take both of them, Lucy (Beulah Bondi) settles with a son in New York City and Bark (Victor Moore) settles with a daughter 300 miles away in the country.  Things don’t work out well for anyone concerned, as the parents disrupt their children’s’ established routines and the couple pine for each other.  They are allowed a second honeymoon in New York City before being again separated, perhaps forever.

Mr. Horton, Hotel Manager: Have you any children?
Pa: Five of them.
Mr. Horton, Hotel manager: Really! I’ll bet they’ve brought you a lot of pleasure!
Pa: [Ironically] I bet you haven’t any children.

This is a really heartbreaking film. I think I felt the saddest that the couple, who so clearly loved and needed each other, had to be separated. The children meant well but every one of them put their own needs first. I don’t think I’ll ever be able to listen to “Let Me Call You Sweetheart” again without getting tears in my eyes.  Beulah Bondi and Victor Moore do an excellent job of portraying characters 20 years older than their actual age without once going over the top.

A fond farewll

A fond farewell

I kept thinking about what a difference social security could have made in this couple’s life.  After all, these people were basically healthy and able to care for themselves.  They just had no steady income and no prospect of finding employment.  Social Security was enacted in 1935 and implemented in 1937.  The film historian who presented a video essay on the Criterion DVD said that the film makes a powerful argument for old age insurance without ever mentioning it.  I agree.

Trailer

David Holzman’s Diary (1967)

David Holzman’s Diarydavid-holzmans-diary-movie-poster
Directed by Jim McBride
1967/USA
Produced by Jim McBride

#486 of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die
First viewing

I ran out of 1934 rentals to watch so I picked this at random because it was on Netflix streaming. First, let me say that I was really glad I knew absolutely nothing about this film when I put it on. There are many surprises that shouldn’t be spoiled.

“Le cinéma, c’est vingt-quatre fois la vérité par seconde.” ― Jean-Luc Godard

It is New York City in 1967. A young film maker has just lost his job and received a draft notice.  He decides he will film his life in hopes to understand it better. He has faith in the Godard quote “Film is truth 24 times per second” and thinks that he may be able to connect with objects, events, and people by capturing them on celluloid.

The narrator’s girlfriend is an important part of his life so he keeps filming her at random times, including while she is sleeping nude. She rapidly calls their relationship off but he continues to more or less stalk her for the rest of the film. He also captures the atmosphere of his neighborhood and the people there, spies on a woman in an apartment across the street, follows a random woman leaving the subway, gets propositioned by  a transvestite, etc., etc.
David Holzman's Diary 5The soundtrack includes a lot of TV and radio news which gives a real flavor of the time. There is a fantastic sequence of high-speed shots from all the TV shows he watched one night that is like a mini time capsule.  In between the street photography, there are lots of times where the guy just rants to the camera. In the end, he is disappointed that his film did not explain his life.  I think the audience is a lot more able to spot his gradual disintegration than he is.

I’m not able to describe this very well and it may sound boring but I was fascinated throughout. (It helps that the movie is only 74 minutes long.)

David Holzman's Diary 1SPOILER: Well, this film’s claim to fame is that it is a fake documentary/satire but I didn’t know that and I was surprised when the credits started rolling. This made me even more impressed with the film. It is so cleverly done.

“Every edit is a lie.” ― Jean-Luc Godard

Admittedly, there were some parts where I was asking myself a) how did this guy get so much money to buy equipment and live on the Upper West Side of Manhattan?; b) who is filming him? c) did all these unwilling victims of his photography sue him? d) why would somebody release such an unflattering picture of himself? At any rate, the film makers tricked me into believing it was a documentary.  This would make a good companion piece to Buñuel’s Land Without Bread,  I definitely liked this one better than that, though.

This film was selected to the National Film Registry, Library of Congress, in 1991. Must one see this before one dies?   I don’t know if I would go that far but I did enjoy it and I know I’ll think about it.

Clip – “watching television”