Tag Archives: Hollywood

Ruggles of Red Gap (1935)

Ruggles of Red GapRuggles-of-Red-Gap-Poster
Directed by Leo McCarey
1935/USA
Paramount Pictures

Repeat viewing

 

Egbert Floud: [pouring champagne] What you want is… is… is… some more of this imprisoned laughter of the pleasant maids of France.

This seldom mentioned treasure is one of the reasons I keep watching these old movies!  It has a perfect cast, a wonderful script, and is expertly directed by Leo McCarey.

The time is the Gay 90’s.  The place is Paris.  Charles Laughton plays Ruggles, the proper English valet to the Earl of Burnstead (Roland Young).  The Earl “loses” Ruggles to the rough-and-ready American Egbert Floud (Charlie Ruggles) in a poker game.  Mrs. Floud has taken a fancy to Ruggles because she thinks he can civilize her boisterous husband and improve her social standing.  Egbert immediately treats Ruggles as his equal, much to Ruggles’ embarrassment.

The Flouds soon return with Ruggles to Red Gap in Wild West Washington State.  Due to a misunderstanding, society thinks that Ruggles is a house guest of the Floud’s and they are hard-pressed to deny it.  In the meantime, Ruggles is introduced to American ways.  Then the Earl comes to visit and Ruggles has some decisions to make.  With Zasu Pitts as Ruggles’ lady love and Leila Heims as the local “bad girl”.

Ruggles of Red Gap 1

I smiled throughout this entire film, even when I had a little tear in my eye.  I think this is Charlie Ruggles’ finest performance, and I always like him.  Roland Young and Zasu Pitts are also perfectly charming.  And just watch Charles Laughton recite the Gettysburg Address!  This movie is great.  My highest recommendation.

Peter Bogdanovich comments on the film with clips

Mark of the Vampire (1935)

Mark of the Vampire
Directed by Tod Browning
1935/USA
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer

First viewing

 

 

[box] Prof. Zelin: We must all die. There’s nothing terrible about death, but to live on after death, a soul earth-bound, a vampire. You don’t wish any such fate for your beloved.[/box]

This is a sound re-make of the famous lost silent horror picture, London After Midnight, which starred Lon Chaney.  It also shares a lot of themes with Tod Browning’s 1931 Dracula.  The film begins in the same ambiguous Middle European milieu with the peasants all convinced that there are vampires in their midst.  Soon Sir Karell, a local aristocrat, is found dead with tell-tale marks on his throat and his body drained dry of blood.  The doctor names the cause of death as vampire attack but the police inspector (Lionel Atwill) is not buying it.  Sir Karrell’s daughter’s (Elizabeth Allan) wedding plans are disrupted and she goes to live with her guardian (Jean Herscholt).  A year later, the daughter is visited by a shrouded female  apparition on the terrace and a Van Helsing-like  professor (Lionel Barrymore) is called in.  With a mostly silent Bela Lugosi again in his Dracula cape as “Count Mora”.

To those that like this sort of thing, this will be a hell of a lot of fun.  The mechanical bats with their visible wires and the possums lurking in the creepy castle only add to the experience.  The plot doesn’t bear much scrutiny but I found it satisfying in the end.  The cast is top-notch and any over-acting works in this context.  The comic relief maid is less annoying than many such characters.

I watched this as part of the Hollywood Legends of Horror collection which gathers six MGM horror movies of the 1930s.  I particularly liked the commentary track on this one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKoia0nGKbQ

Trailer – soooo camp!  so fun!

Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back (1980)

Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back
Directed by Irvin Kershner
1980/USA
Lucasfilm

Repeat viewing
#663 of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die
IMDb users say 8.8/10; I say 8.0/10

 

[box] Luke: All right, I’ll give it a try.

Yoda: No. Try not. Do… or do not. There is no try.[/box]

I watched it, I was entertained, and somehow I am stumped for anything else to say. This is kind of a western in space where a hard-pressed but plucky band of rebels fight the might of an evil empire.  I remember very little of the plot of the previous part so am not exactly sure how the crew got where they are.

The rebel forces are hiding out from the Empire on an isolated frozen planet called Hoth where they have various encounters with ice monsters, etc. before being located and attacked by imperial forces.  Luke Skywalker receives a visitation from the spirit of Obi Wan Kanobe telling him to go to Dagobah for Jedi training.  After a battle, Han and Leia escape with imperial fighters in hot pursuit and Luke goes separately to Dagobah.

 

There Luke meets Yoda, a Jedi master, who attempts to discipline the impatient hot-tempered youth to the ways of the Force.  Luke eventually calms down but during his training has a vision that Han and Leia are in danger.  Despite being warned by both Yoda and Obi Wan that he should finish his training, Luke decides to take off for Bespin where Han and Leia have fallen into a trap and where Darth Vader and imperial forces wait to capture Luke.

In the meantime, Han and Leia have gone to the planet of Bespin where Han’s friend Lalo Calrissian runs a mining operation.  Darth Vader and his imperial forces are lieing in wait.    Vader turns Han over to a bounty hunter and imprisons Leia.  His real prey is Luke.  When Luke arrives he engages in a mano-a-mano light saber fight with Vader.  Vader urges Luke to join him on the dark side but Luke refuses.  Will Luke survive?  Will the trio be reunited? If you don’t know, I won’t tell.

I cannot deny that the Star Wars series is a must-see as it launched a new generation of special effects that still inspire film makers today.  Other than that, it is an entertaining action-packed adventure with clear good guys and bad guys and a definite code of morality.  I like the fact that the technology is so fallible and the humans are the bosses of the robots.  However, I don’t connect with it on an emotional level.

1979 Theatrical Trailer – No Yoda?

Ben-Hur (1959)

Ben-Hur
Directed by William Wyler
1959/USA
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer

First viewing
#349 of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die

 

[box] Judah Ben-Hur: [after he is sentenced to the galleys] May God grant me vengeance! I will pray that you live until I return!

Messala: [ironically] Return?[/box]

This big-budget epic delivers in all the blockbuster categories.  It is approximately 27 A.D. Judah Ben-Hur (Charlton Heston) is a prince and the richest man in Judea.  He was a childhood friend of Messala (Stephen Boyd), a Roman who has now returned to Judea as Tribune of the occupying Romans.  Their friendship is soon severed when Ben-Hur refuses to inform on Jewish rebels. When a tile from Ben-Hur’s roof injures the Governor, he is sentenced as a galley-slave and his mother and sister are imprisoned.

Ben-Hur survives three years on the galleys and attracts the notice of Consul Quintus Arrius (Jack Hawkins).  He rescues Arrius from drowning during a sea battle and earns the older man’s eternal gratitude.  He becomes a victorious chariot racer in Rome.  After Arrius formally adopts Hur, he returns to Judea to search for his mother and sister and exact revenge on Messala.  Throughout the story, Ben-Hur encounters Jesus of Nazereth, who inspires him with his mercy.

As I have mentioned before, the epic is my least favorite genre and this film combines the sword-and-sandal variant with the biblical variant.  I am also not a fan of Charlton Heston’s acting. I must obey the commands of the Random Number Generator however or I would never get around to many of the unseen movies on my List!

While I can’t say that I loved this movie, I must admit that as a pure spectacle it can’t be faulted.  The famous chariot race is particularly thrilling and the settings and costumes are great.  I enjoyed the commentary track on the Blu-Ray DVD I rented even more than the film.  This movie was MGM’s chance at salvation from bankruptcy after the studio had taken a drubbing from television.  It was also interesting to learn about the filming in Rome and the different techniques used to get the effects.

Did any one else not know that movie theaters really didn’t sell candy or popcorn in their lobbies until they started having to compete with at-home TV viewing?  I had always assumed that popcorn was a permanent fixture of movie-going.

Trailer

 

The Lives of a Bengal Lancer (1935)

The Lives of a Bengal Lancer
Directed by Henry Hathaway
1935/USA
Paramount Pictures

First viewing

 

[box] Lieutenant Alan McGregor: Why? Well – well, there’s some things they don’t teach you in military college – can’t, I guess. India is big, you know, there’s over three hundred million people, and run by just a handful of men. The – the job comes first. Like old ramrod. You can’t let death move you, nor love. And it’s like – and how can I tell you what it’s all about when I don’t know myself?[/box]

In this unexpected gem, Col. Tom Stone (Sir. Guy Standing) commands a regiment of the Bengal Lancers that is patrolling the northeast border of British India fighting skirmishes with rebels who hide out in the mountains (of Afghanistan?) .  Lt. McGregor (Gary Cooper) greatly resents the colonel’s by-the-books manner.  Two fresh replacements arrive, Lt. Forsythe (Franchot Tone) and Lt. Stone, the colonel’s son (Richard Cromwell).  Forsythe is a wise cracking pro but Stone is fresh out of Sandhurst and has a lot to learn.  To add to his problems, the colonel is determined that there should be no special relationship between father and son.   The tension rises when a shipment of ammunition is diverted by the rebels due to a miscalculation by Lt. Stone.

This was a really excellent film and even had me in tears at the end.  All the acting is good but I particularly enjoyed Guy Standing’s turn as the colonel who must balance duty with fatherly love.  It has the blessed advantage of no romantic subplot so it can concentrate on questions of honor and loyalty.  It also delivers on the action and bantering comedy fronts.  Warmly recommended.

The film was nominated for eight Academy Awards including Best Picture and Best Director.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVe9y1en6Kc

Trailer

 

Man on the Flying Trapeze (1935)

Man on the Flying Trapeze
Directed by Clyde Bruckman
1935/USA
Paramount Pictures

First viewing

 

[box] Ambrose’s Secretary: It must be hard to lose your mother-in-law.

Ambrose Wolfinger: Yes it is, very hard. It’s almost impossible.[/box]

No trapeze here.  A day in the life of Ambrose Wolfinger (W.C. Fields) begins with two singing burglars in his basement.  We then follow the henpecked family man on his adventures in jail, at work, driving a car, and at a wrestling match.  All ends well, as usual.  With Kathleen Howard, Grady Sutton, and Vera Lewis as Ambrose’s obnoxious wife, brother-in-law, and mother-in-law and Mary Brian as his loving daughter.

The saving grace of this movie comes near the end when Fields actually stands up to his family and even punches his horrible brother-in-law!  Otherwise, watch the clip.  If you think Fields fiddling with his socks and putting off his encounter with the burglars is amusing, the rest of the film will be even funnier.  As for me, after the first minute of the clip, I am just waiting for him to get on with it already.

Clip – opening

 

The Informer (1935)

The Informer
Directed by John Ford
1935/USA
RKO Radio Pictures

Repeat viewing

 

[box] Gypo Nolan: And now the British think I’m with the Irish, and the Irish think I’m with the British. The long and short of it is I’m walkin’ around starving without a dog to lick my trousers![/box]

Gypo Nolan (Victor McLaghlen) is a big lug who is down on his luck.  He got bounced from his local IRA unit for failing to kill a prisoner.  He is broke and his girl has turned to prostitution.  One fine night he notices a poster promising a 20 pound reward for the capture of his friend, Frankie.  Shortly thereafter, he sees an advertisement for a sea voyage to America for 10 pounds.  He meets Frankie at a pub and, without much thought, is off to the British soldiers who patrol the streets.  Only problem is everything Gypo does is on impulse, he is mighty fond of the bottle, and the IRA will stop at nothing to root out the informer.

You can almost feel the dampness and cold of the foggy streets of Dublin when you watch this movie.  This is more “stage-bound” somehow than other Ford films but is nonetheless excellent.  Victor McLaghlen is wonderful.  You believe all the bewilderment, bluster, and violence of the character.  Whether this was a match of actor with role or a specific characterization I don’t know and it doesn’t really matter.  I have read, though, that John Ford was really rough on McLaghlen (making him perform without notice and hung over, etc.) to get the performance out of him.

The Informer won Oscars for Best Director, Best Actor, Best Screenplay and Best Score and was  nominated for Best Picture and Best Editing.  Is the first film and only film to win the New York Film Critics Circle award for Best Picture by a unanimous vote on the first ballot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_c9JenLClo

Re-release trailer

 

Les Misérables (1935)

Les Misérablesles miserables poster
Directed by Richard Boleslawski
1935/USA
20th Century Pictures

First viewing

 

Jean Valjean: Remember to love each other, always. There’s scarcely anything else in life but that.

Hollywood adaptation of the Victor Hugo novel starring Fredric March as Jean Valjean and Charles Laughton as Inspector Javert with Cedric Hardwicke as the Bishop, Rochelle Hudson as Cosette and Francis Drake as Eponine.  The film makers managed to fit the plot into a 108-minute feature film by completely eliminating the Thenardiers, the innkeepers who mistreated little Cosette and went on to hound Jean Valjean.  The film, which benefited from cinematography by Gregg Toland, was nominated for Academy Awards for Best Picture and Best Editing.

Les Miserables 1

Two more different interpretations of Jean Valjean could not be seen than those of Fredric March and Harry Bauer, who played the role in the 1934 French film.  Bauer says very little and March can scarcely stop talking.  That is not to say March is bad, he is very good.  Laughton is outstanding and restrained, playing Javert as a neurotic seeking to compensate for his low birth by a rigid adherence to the law.  I could have done without the celestial choir when Valjean has his redemptive revelation.  On the whole, I can recommend this film, though if you are going to pick just one I would say to definitely go for the 1934 version directed by Raymond Bernard.

Here is a very interesting article on film adaptations of Les Miserables.  I was surprised there have been quite so many!  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptations_of_Les_Mis%C3%A9rables

Clips from the film available at TCM:  http://www.tcm.com/mediaroom/video/253377/Les-Miserables-Movie-Clip-Emile-Javert.html

David Copperfield (1935)

David Copperfield
Directed by George Cukor
1935/USA
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer

Repeat viewing

 

[box] Mr. Micawber: Copperfield, you perceive before you, the shattered fragments of a temple once called Man. The blossom is blighted. The leaf is withered. The God of Day goes down upon the dreary scene. In short, I am forever floored.[/box]

An MGM adaptation of the Dickens novel, this film follows the life of David Copperfield from his posthumous birth to a childlike widow, to the cruel treatment by his stepfather, friendship with the Micawbers, eventual home with his aunt, and young adulthood.  This was one of those productions that allowed the studio to show off its vast resources of talent in the many character parts.  With Freddy Bartholomew as the young David, Edna May Oliver as Aunt Betsey Trotwood, Basil Rathbone as Murdstone, Jessie Ralph as Peggoty, Lionel Barrymore as Dan Peggoty, W.C. Fields as Micawber, Elsa Lanchester as Clickett, Roland Young as Uriah Heep, Margaret O’Sullivan as Dora and many, many more.

It is impossible to convey the story of the novel in a two hour movie and so the ending, in particular, seems rushed.  Freddie Bartholomew can be very touching at times and a little too much of a good thing at others.  That said, there are some wonderful performances here.  Basil Rathbone is absolutely chilling as Murdstone, quite different from his swashbuckling villains, and Edna May Oliver is hilarious as the intimidating but tender Aunt Betsey.  Finally, it’s a treat to see W.C. Fields as Micawber playing quite the devoted husband and father to his brood!  I enjoyed this.

Trailer

Being John Malkovich (1999)

Being John Malkovich
Directed by Spike Jonze
1999/USA
Gramercy Pictures/Propaganda Films/Single Cell Pictures

First viewing
#961 of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die
IMDb users say 7.8/10; I say 7.0/10

 

[box] Craig Schwartz (in John Malkovich): You see, Maxine, it isn’t just playing with dolls.

Maxine: You’re right, my darling, it’s so much more. It’s playing with people![/box]

This was a well made picture but it just wasn’t for me.  Puppeteer Craig Schwartz (John Cusak) lives a vaguely eccentric but unexciting life with his wife Lotte (an unrecognizable Cameron Diaz) and a menagerie of animals.  Craig starts work at a strange company owned by Dr. Lester (Orson Bean) and located on the 7 1/2 floor of an office building where the ceilings are about four feet high.

While working there, Craig becomes infatuated with Maxine (Catherine Keener), who is definitely not interested.  Then Craig discovers a portal that will take anyone into the mind of actor John Malkovich for 15 minutes.  Craig and Maxine parlay this into a paying business but the enterprise doesn’t last long after Lotte discovers she can’t get enough of being inside the actor, especially when he is inside of Maxine.  Craig finds a way to win Maxine and fulfill his ambitions, while Lotte bides her time.

I must start out by saying that I would pay money not to spend any time in another person’s head, so the concept of the film was not too intriguing to me.  I have to admit the story was very inventive, with oddball characters and situations at every turn, but I kept having the feeling that it was a big joke on the audience.  I hate movies that laugh at me.  After watching the supplements on the Blu-Ray, I feel I may have a better handle on what the film makers were possibly trying to communicate about celebrity and escapism.  The most reassuring point was in the interview with Malkovich in which he said that Generation Xers tend to respond to the movie while baby boomers (me) do not.

I was very impressed by the acting in this film, especially that of John Malkovich, who was required to play several different parts while also playing himself.   Everybody else was also very good.  I like John Cusak in almost everything he is in.  The music was nice.

Trailer