Manhattan Melodrama (1934)

Manhattan MelodramaManhattan Melodrama Poster
Directed by W. S. Van Dyke
1934/USA
Cosmopolitan Productions for Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM)

First Viewing

 

James W. ‘Jim’ Wade: I’m going to clean out every rotten spot I can find in this city, and, Blackie, I don’t want to find you in any of them.

Blackie and Jim were childhood buddies. Both were rescued from a tragic steamship fire and then raised together by a man who was trampled to death at a political rally. Blackie (Clark Gable) grows up to be a gambler and tough while Jim (William Powell) grows up a lawyer and idealistic politico. Blackie’s main squeeze is Eleanor (Myrna Loy) but he eventually loses her to Jim who is the marrying kind. Jim becomes District Attorney and friendship and crime-fighting come into conflict.  I think we all know where this is going!

ManhattanMelodramaStill4

I thought the script really let down the actors, who were fine. There were just one too many coincidences and everybody was a tad too noble for me to bear. But what do I know? This won an Oscar for Best Original Screenplay in 1934.

This was the movie that bank robber John Dillinger had just seen before he was gunned down in front of Chicago’s Biograph Theater on July 22, 1934.

Trailer

Of Human Bondage (1934)

Of Human Bondageofhumanbondage_poster
Directed by John Cromwell
1934/USA
RKO Radio Pictures

First Viewing

 

Mildred Rogers: You cad, you dirty swine! I never cared for you, not once! I was always makin’ a fool of ya! Ya bored me stiff; I hated ya! It made me SICK when I had to let ya kiss me. I only did it because ya begged me, ya hounded me and drove me crazy! And after ya kissed me, I always used to wipe my mouth! WIPE MY MOUTH!

Leslie Howard plays Philip Carey, a club-footed medical student with the soul of an artist. He falls helplessly in love with Mildred (Bette Davis), a waitress with a heart of ice who treats him like dirt. She figures that she can always go to Philip for help when she is in trouble and she is right.

Of Human Bondage Davis

Bette Davis begged Warner Bros. to loan her to RKO so that she could play the meaty but unsympathetic role of Mildred. Her gamble paid off and the movie made her a star. Her performance is excellent and far less mannered than she would get in later roles. Leslie Howard is actually the central character and he acquits himself well as the pathetic young man.  I thought the ending was a bit weak but it turns out that it is the same as in the novel.

Tokyo Story (1953)

Tokyo Story (“Tôkyô monogatari”)Tokyo Story DVD
Yasujirô Ozu
1953/Japan
Shôchiku Eiga

#257 of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die
Multiple Viewings

Kyoko: Isn’t life disappointing?
Noriko: [smiles] Yes, it is.

This is one of my very favorite films by my very favorite director and I feel like I’m too close to it to find the right words to review it.  I love this and Ozu’s other films because they are unique in giving me a sort of nostalgia, like a bittersweet sadness for a time now lost.  Although I have no reason to be nostalgic for 1950’s Japan, Ozu shows us the core of family life, with its inevitable challenges, in a way that speaks to every time and place.   Ozu’s deliberate pacing and formal compositions encourage a contemplative attitude on the part of the audience, allowing our impressions to linger and evolve.

Shukichi (Ozu regular Chisu Ryu) and Tomi (Chieko Higashiyama) are an elderly couple who have not seen their scattered adult children for several years.  They eagerly set off by train to visit them in Osaka and Tokyo.  When they get to Tokyo, it gradually becomes clear that their son and daughter are too busy with their own lives to entertain their parents.    In contrast, Noriko, the widow of  a son who died in the war, (Setsuko Hara) takes time off from work and extends herself gladly to make her in-laws welcome.

tokyo-story 3

Daughter Shige (Haruko Sugimura) is particularly ungracious and stingy toward her parents.  We learn that she has built up resentments from childhood at her mother’s weight and her father’s drinking.  Shige comes up with the idea of sending the old people to a beach resort to avoid having to take them places.  During his stay with Shige, Shukichi goes out on the town with old friends and gets thoroughly drunk.  It turns out all the old men are disappointed in their children but Shukichi reminds the others that children must be expected grow up and live their own lives, that is just the way life is.  Finally, the old couple decide to cut their visit short and head back for home in the country.

tokyo story 2

Tomi falls in ill on the train and the two spend a night at their younger son’s place in Osaka.  While there, they reflect that their children are a disappointment but still are better than most children.

After they arrive home, Tomi is stricken and becomes critically ill.  The clan gathers once again at their childhood home.  They grieve when Tomi dies yet revert to their old ways after the funeral, Shige asking for some of her mother’s clothes almost before the corpse is cold.

tokyo-story-1953-family-seated

Kyoko, the couple’s youngest daughter who still lives at home, bitterly denounces her siblings as selfish.  The unselfish Noriko explains that it is natural that the older children have busy lives of their own and that eventually she, too, may need to think of herself first.  Life is disappointing but that is the way it is.

Shukishi urges Noriko to remarry and tells her she is a good woman who treated them better than their blood relations on the trip.  In tears, Noriko responds that she is not so good but is very lonely and at loose ends.  Kyoko has already left for work and Noriko now departs for Tokyo by train.  The film ends with Shukishi agreeing with a neighbor that stops by that life will be lonely now.

Ozu allows us to draw our own conclusions.  We are given ample space and time to get to know the characters.  Surely, we are meant to see that the Tokyo children treat their parents very badly but just as certainly we are meant to consider the parent’s acceptant response as admirable.  Life is disappointing, but it goes on.

Trailer

The Black Cat (1934)

The Black CatBlack Cat Poster
Directed by Edgar G. Ulmer
1934/USA
Universal Pictures

Second viewing

 

Highly enjoyable pre-Code Universal horror outing with boffo dual performances by Karloff and Lugosi.

Peter Allison: I don’t know. It all sounds like a lot of supernatural baloney to me.
Dr. Vitus Verdegast: Supernatural, perhaps. Baloney, perhaps not. There are many things under the sun.[/box]

Dr. Vitus Vendergast (Bela Lugosi) meets honeymooners Peter (David Manners) and Joan on a train and hitches a ride with them to their ultimate destination. On the way, the car goes off the road, the driver is killed and the party is forced to take refuge in the creepy modernist castle of Hjalmar Poelzig (Boris Karloff).

The-Black-Cat 2

This suits Vendergast just fine as he is on a mission to make Poelzig, his sworn enemy, suffer slowly. Poelzig left Vendergast to rot in prison for 15 years then told Vendergast’s wife she was a widow and took her for his own.

Hjalmar Poelzig: The phone is dead. Do you hear that, Vitus? Even the phone is dead.

The movie is basically a duel of wits between Vendergast and Poelzig, who also has plans to use Joan as the sacrifice in a Black Mass.   As for a black cat, well one wanders around, but it’s basically just an excuse to use the Edgar Allen Poe title

Black Cat 1

This is the kind of thing I just eat up. Sure it can be a little campy in places and Lugosi over-emotes furiously but that is part of the fun. The Expressionist cinematography and art direction are quite wonderful.  Recommended for lovers of classic Universal horror.

Charlie Chan in London (1934)

Charlie Chan in LondonCharlie Chan in London Poster
Directed by Eugene Ford
1934/USA
Fox Film Corporation

First Viewing

 

 

Charlie Chan: If you want wild bird to sing do not put him in cage.

A woman is convinced that her brother, who has been sentenced to death, is innocent of murdering the Secretary of the Hunt at a mansion where he was staying.  Charlie Chan (Werner Oland) is called in on the case only three days before the hanging.  Will he be able to discover the true killer on the grounds of the British country house?  Need you ask?  Also with Ray Milland as the condemned man’s attorney and Alan Mowbray as the owner of the mansion.

charlie chan in london 3

This is a pretty good entry in the Charlie Chan series.  Charlie does without the assistance of Number One Son here.  The DVD comes with a featurette in which various people argue that the Charlie Chan character, despite some stereotyping, was a positive development for the image of Chinese Americans in films.  Up to then, Chinese were generally portrayed as either servants or evil doers.  Charlie Chan was always the smartest guy in the room.  It’s unfortunate that the times allowed him to be portrayed by a Swede, however talented.

Slacker (1991)

SlackerSlacker DVD
Directed by Richard Linklater
1991/USA
Detour Film Production

#840 of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die
First Viewing

 

This is another of those unseen 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die titles on Netflix streaming. I could have lived without this one.

Hitchhiker: Every single commodity you produce is a piece of your own death!

This movie basically follows a whole bunch of twenty-somethings with time on their hands around Austin, Texas for a day. Most of the characters are oddballs with an axe to grind or and a willingness to go on and on about it. There are a few fragments that might be said to tell some sort of story but we leave all of those quickly. The end.

Anti-Artist: Uh, I don’t do much really, I just read, and work here, and, uh, sleep and eat, and, uh, watch movies.

Woman trying to sell Madonna's pap smear

Woman trying to sell Madonna’s pap smear

I would like to get 97 minutes of my time back. But don’t take my word for it. For some reason, this film is in the National Film Registry. Hip people probably get a lot out of it.

Trailer

 

The Phantom of the Opera (1925)

The Phantom of the OperaPhantom Poster
Directed by Rupert Julian
1925/USA
Universal Pictures

#26 of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die
First Viewing

 

This is another of the movies from The List that I had never seen before and was available from Netflix streaming.

Erik: Feast your eyes! Glut your soul on my accursed ugliness!

Erik (Lon Chaney), a self-taught musician and disfigured, criminally insane fugitive, has taken refuge in the cavernous cellars of the Paris Opera House. There he has been taken for a phantom that haunts the opera house. He develops a passion for rising opera singer Christine and promotes her career by writing threatening letters to keep the star diva from singing and by killing the audience with a chandelier when that doesn’t work. Eventually, he lures Christine to his realm where she soon learns of the hideous countenance hidden by his mask. He agrees to allow Christine to return to the opera on the condition that she stay away from her lover. Naturally, Christine cannot resist and all hell breaks loose.

Phantom of the Opera Technicolor

The Phantom as the Red Death

I must say that this is much creepier and more gripping than the 1943 Claude Rains version. The print I saw had quite a bit of tinting, two-strip Technicolor sequences, and a specially composed score that heightened the effects. Chaney was spectacular and, while I could have lived without some of Mary Philbin’s posturing, I really enjoyed it.

The unmasking scene

 

It’s a Gift (1934)

It’s a Giftits_a_gift DVD
Directed by Norman Z. McLeod
1934/USA
Paramount Pictures

#81 of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die
Second viewing

 

W.C. Fields plays Harold Bisonette (that’s Biso-NAY when his wife’s around). The hen-pecked Bisonette owns a corner grocery but dreams of moving to California and running an orange ranch. His uncle dies and leaves him the money to move his family West, much to their disgust. The orange grove turns out to be a bust but there is always a happy ending in a W.C. Fields movie.

Harry Payne Bosterly: You’re drunk!
Harold: And you’re crazy. But I’ll be sober tomorrow and you’ll be crazy for the rest of your life.

It's a Gift 3

I have been trying to figure out why Fields just isn’t funny to me. I think he lets each of his gags run on too long and telegraphs them too obviously. Also much of the humor relies on destruction, irritating noises, etc., which I find more annoying than comic. Finally this movie has a scene of food humor toward the end. I can’t help it, I just find anything involving making a mess with food more disgusting than anything else.

This is one of the 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die. The only reason I can find is that W.C. Fields is a name everybody has probably heard of. I now have seen this film twice and that’s more than enough for one lifetime.

The porch scene (Karl L-a-F-o-n-g)

Make Way for Tomorrow (1937)

Make Way for Tomorrowmakewayfortomorrow-2009criteriondvd
Directed by Leo McCarey
1937/USA
Paramount Pictures

#109 of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die
First Viewing

 

I watched this as a companion piece to Ozu’s Tokyo Story, with which it is thematically linked.  Both films deal with relations between parents and their adult children.  This film confronts the issue more directly as the children are faced with having to care for their parents in old age.  It is also one of the few films to portray married love in the sunset of life.  Although it is a more sentimental story, it is also an excellent film.

Make Way for Tomorrow 3

The children are stunned at the news that the parents have to leave their home in two days.

Lucy and Barkley Cooper have been happily married for 50 years when the bank forecloses on their home. Since none of their five children is willing to take both of them, Lucy (Beulah Bondi) settles with a son in New York City and Bark (Victor Moore) settles with a daughter 300 miles away in the country.  Things don’t work out well for anyone concerned, as the parents disrupt their children’s’ established routines and the couple pine for each other.  They are allowed a second honeymoon in New York City before being again separated, perhaps forever.

Mr. Horton, Hotel Manager: Have you any children?
Pa: Five of them.
Mr. Horton, Hotel manager: Really! I’ll bet they’ve brought you a lot of pleasure!
Pa: [Ironically] I bet you haven’t any children.

This is a really heartbreaking film. I think I felt the saddest that the couple, who so clearly loved and needed each other, had to be separated. The children meant well but every one of them put their own needs first. I don’t think I’ll ever be able to listen to “Let Me Call You Sweetheart” again without getting tears in my eyes.  Beulah Bondi and Victor Moore do an excellent job of portraying characters 20 years older than their actual age without once going over the top.

A fond farewll

A fond farewell

I kept thinking about what a difference social security could have made in this couple’s life.  After all, these people were basically healthy and able to care for themselves.  They just had no steady income and no prospect of finding employment.  Social Security was enacted in 1935 and implemented in 1937.  The film historian who presented a video essay on the Criterion DVD said that the film makes a powerful argument for old age insurance without ever mentioning it.  I agree.

Trailer

David Holzman’s Diary (1967)

David Holzman’s Diarydavid-holzmans-diary-movie-poster
Directed by Jim McBride
1967/USA
Produced by Jim McBride

#486 of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die
First viewing

I ran out of 1934 rentals to watch so I picked this at random because it was on Netflix streaming. First, let me say that I was really glad I knew absolutely nothing about this film when I put it on. There are many surprises that shouldn’t be spoiled.

“Le cinéma, c’est vingt-quatre fois la vérité par seconde.” ― Jean-Luc Godard

It is New York City in 1967. A young film maker has just lost his job and received a draft notice.  He decides he will film his life in hopes to understand it better. He has faith in the Godard quote “Film is truth 24 times per second” and thinks that he may be able to connect with objects, events, and people by capturing them on celluloid.

The narrator’s girlfriend is an important part of his life so he keeps filming her at random times, including while she is sleeping nude. She rapidly calls their relationship off but he continues to more or less stalk her for the rest of the film. He also captures the atmosphere of his neighborhood and the people there, spies on a woman in an apartment across the street, follows a random woman leaving the subway, gets propositioned by  a transvestite, etc., etc.
David Holzman's Diary 5The soundtrack includes a lot of TV and radio news which gives a real flavor of the time. There is a fantastic sequence of high-speed shots from all the TV shows he watched one night that is like a mini time capsule.  In between the street photography, there are lots of times where the guy just rants to the camera. In the end, he is disappointed that his film did not explain his life.  I think the audience is a lot more able to spot his gradual disintegration than he is.

I’m not able to describe this very well and it may sound boring but I was fascinated throughout. (It helps that the movie is only 74 minutes long.)

David Holzman's Diary 1SPOILER: Well, this film’s claim to fame is that it is a fake documentary/satire but I didn’t know that and I was surprised when the credits started rolling. This made me even more impressed with the film. It is so cleverly done.

“Every edit is a lie.” ― Jean-Luc Godard

Admittedly, there were some parts where I was asking myself a) how did this guy get so much money to buy equipment and live on the Upper West Side of Manhattan?; b) who is filming him? c) did all these unwilling victims of his photography sue him? d) why would somebody release such an unflattering picture of himself? At any rate, the film makers tricked me into believing it was a documentary.  This would make a good companion piece to Buñuel’s Land Without Bread,  I definitely liked this one better than that, though.

This film was selected to the National Film Registry, Library of Congress, in 1991. Must one see this before one dies?   I don’t know if I would go that far but I did enjoy it and I know I’ll think about it.

Clip – “watching television”