If a Man Answers Directed by Henry Levin Written by Richard Morris from a novel by Winifred Wolfe 1962/USA Ross Hunter Productions/Universal International Pictures
First viewing/Netflix rentals
[box] Germaine Stacy: Husbands often leave home. Pets never do. There must be a reason.[/box]
This mildly risque sitcom shows how a new bride learns to manipulate her man.
Chantal Stacey (Sandra Dee) was born of a wealthy Bostonian father and French mother. As the film begins she is ripe for marriage. She selects an unlikely candidate in confirmed bachelor Eugene Wright (Bobby Darrin). It doesn’t take long before all his defenses are gone and they wed.
The newlyweds go through the normal growing pains. Chantal’s mother advises Chantal on how to keep her man’s interest. This includes a dog training manual and the jealousy maneuver. With John Lund of Bulldog Drummond fame as Chantal’s father, Cesar Romero as a mystery man, and Stephanie Powers as Chantal’s rival.
With the addition of a laugh track this could have played on 60’s TV, minus a couple of slightly naughty bits. The chemistry between Dee and Darrin carries the piece.
Montage of clips with Darrin’s rendition of the title tune
The Cabinet of Caligari
Directed by Roger Kay
Written by Robert Bloch
1962/USA
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation/Associated Producers/Robert L. Lippert Productions
First viewing/YouTube
Caligari: How old were you when you first let a man make love to you? Next, who was he? Next, how did you feel at the time? Next, how did you feel afterwards? What did you feel? What did you think? Were you pleased, frightened, ecstatic, disgusted? What did he say? What words did you speak? That’s what I want to know. Now. Tell me. Now. Now. All of it, now. Tell me. YES!
While it does not measure up to its illustrious predecessor or even its own poster, this confusing little thriller did hold my interest.
The YouTube version available to me cut off the credits and probably a few of the first minutes of the film. At any rate, Jane Lindstrom (Glenys Johns) has been plunked down into the middle of some kind of hotel or other lodging place and now is unable to leave. She is tormented by encounters with Caligari (Dan O’Herlihy).
Jane tries to enlist the help of her fellow guests, without success. I won’t spoil the ending.
I wasn’t expecting much from the title but it turns out the leads were A-list actors and its a competently made film. The director even tries to get a little Expressionistic in places but without the effect of the films famous predecessor.
My Life to Live (Vivre sa vie: Film en douze tableaux) Directed by Jean-Luc Godard Written by Jean-Luc Godard and Marcel Sacotte from the book by Sacotte 1962/France Les Films de la Pleiade/Pathe Consortium Cinema
First viewing/Netflix rental
One of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die
[box] Nana: The more one talks, the less the words mean.[/box]
Despite a luminous performance by Anna Karina, I have not overcome my aversion to Godard.
The story consists of twelve tableaux or vignettes outlining the descent of Nana (Karina) from shop girl and wanna-be actress to prostitute. As the film begins, Nana is discussing their breakup with her ex-husband or ex-boyfriend. Evidentally, there was a child involved, who is no longer in Nana’s life. Next we observe Nana’s attempts to cadge loans and her boring work-a-day existence.
She is ripe for a new trade and seems to have a knack for it. Unfortunately, she soon turns to a pimp in hopes of higher rewards.
There’s nothing wrong with the story or the acting. The initial conversation is shot with the actors’ backs to the camera and already I was pretty irritated with this movie. The middle part is OK but the penultimate tableaux consists of an interminable pretentious conversation about philosophy and I was annoyed again. Godard is just not for me.
Sanjuro (Tsubaki Sanjuro) Directed by Akira Kurasawa Written by Ryuzo Kikushima, Hido Oguni, and Akira Kurasawa from a novel by Shugoro Yamamoto 1962/Japan Toho Company/Akira Kurasawa Production Company
Repeat viewing/Netflix rental
[box] Sanjûrô Tsubaki: Stupid friends are dangerous.[/box]
The crafty ronin Sanjuro returns – this time to teach life lessons to some clueless samurai.
The nameless ronin of (1961) (Toshiro Mifune) hides out in another town and overhears some young samurai discussing corruption. He straightens them out on who is responsible. Before they can take further action, the good Chamberlain and his family has been kidnapped by the evil Superintendent. The group retrieves the Chamberlain’s wife and daughter (?). The elderly wife impresses Sanjuro with her counsel that a good sword remains in its sheath.
Unfortunately, the young samurais’ impulsive behavior interferes with Sanjuro’s plan to conduct a campaign of wits to return the Chamberlain to power. Bloodletting ensues.
I give Yojimbo only a slight edge over this one. Mifune is once again completely delightful. The film also contains another great performance by Testuya Nakadai as a kindred spirit on the other side. Underneath all the fun are some masterful compositions and camerawork and a wonderful Masaru Sato score. Highly recommended.
The Criterion Blu-Ray looks beautiful and contains a good commentary by a film scholar.
David and Lisa Directed by Frank Perry Written by Eleanor Perry from a book by Theodore Isaac Rubin, MD 1962/USA Lisa and David Company/Vision Associates Productions
Repeat viewing/Netflix rental
[box] David Clemens: What makes you think that I ever really talked to you at all? When people talk, it means they say what they really feel. All you ever do is toss words around.[/box]
Patients David and Lisa help each other recover from mental illness in this drama about a school for troubled youth.
David Clemens (Kier Dullea) lives in his head where he is an expert on psychology. He crumbles into a sobbing mess if anyone, however accidentally, touches him. Lisa Brandt (Janet Margolin) is a child-like schizophrenic who speaks only in rhyme. Somehow the two patients connect on a deep level. David uses his insight to communicate with her and they become friends. In the meantime, David is resistant to any type of therapeutic interaction with the staff.
Eventually, David’s parents take him out of the school. He runs away from home and back to the school where he finally begins to open up.
It is amazing how the nature vs. nurture debate has shifted in the last 55 years. I think most professionals accept a biochemical and genetic model of mental illness these days. It sure is cheaper than talk therapy! Back in 1962, the model was distinctly Freudian. I tend to think that it is a mixture of both nature and nurture. At any rate, this is a touching, if a bit simplistic, coming-of-age story
Lolita Directed by Stanley Kubrick Written by Vladimir Nabokov from his novel (Stanley Kubrick and James B. Harris uncredited) 1962/UK/USA A.A. Productions Ltd./Anya/Harris-Kubrick Productions/Transworld Pictures
Repeat viewing/Netflix rental
[box] Lolita Haze: ‘Fraid someone’s gonna steal your ideas and sell ’em to Hollywood, huh?[/box]
The novel is indeed unfilmable but Kubrick makes an excellent first foray into black comedy.
Suave erudite European Humbert Humbert (James Mason) has a thing about young girls for reasons unexplained in this movie. He has come to America to teach at a college and plans to spend the preceding summer at a resort in Maine. He is looking to rent a room when he meets up with vulgar pathetic landlady Charlotte Haze (Shelley Winters). He is ready to bow out when he catches a glimpse of her blonde 16-year-old daughter Lolita (Sue Lyons) in the garden.
Charlotte is smitten with Humbert and views Lolita as an impediment to alone time. When she gets Lolita out of the way by sending her to camp, she declares her love. Humbert, eager for a convenient step-daughter, marries her.
The rest of the film follows Humbert’s trials and tribulations with his “little girl”. With Peter Sellers as Clare Quilty.
[box] “We had been everywhere. We had really seen nothing. And I catch myself thinking today that our long journey had only defiled with a sinuous trail of slime the lovely, trustful, dreamy, enormous country that by then, in retrospect, was no more to us than a collection of dog-eared maps, ruined tour books, old tires, and her sobs in the night — every night, every night — the moment I feigned sleep.” ― Vladimir Nabokov, Lolita[/box]
Lolita is one of my very favorite novels and I have read it more times than I have seen the movie. There is no way any film could capture it. Not because of the subject matter, but because of the ineffable blend of black comedy with tragedy and because at heart it is a love letter to the English language. For some reason, Nabokov’s screenplay was also gutted The film weakens the pathos by making Lolita a teenager, rather than the 12-year-old of the novel.
That said, Kubrick made a superb comedy on his first attempt. There are some really stunning shots here as well. The performances are all wonderful. I can’t imagine anyone else in the roles, though Jeremy Irons did well in the 1997 remake.
Nabokov was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Writing, Screenplay Based on Material from Another Medium. I see that Nabokov’s actual screenplay is available on Amazon. I look forward to reading it!
No Man Is an Island Directed by Richard Goldstone and John Monks Jr. Written by Richard Goldstone and John Monks Jr. 1962/USA Gold Coast Productions
First viewing/Netflix
[box] Where is Guam and why would North Korea attack it? — Fox News[/box]
If the story weren’t true, one could hardly believe it.
George R. Tweed (Jeffrey Hunter) and some comrades are serving in the Navy on Guam when it is attacked and swiftly occupied by the Japanese, simultaneous with the attack on Pearl Harbor. A very small contingent escapes into the countryside where the residents, previously referred to as “fishheads”, shelter them at considerable danger to themselves. All but Tweed succumb in short order.
He is sent deeper inland to a Catholic compound that has been spared. Tweed begins a small campaign of subversion. Before long, he is chased out of there as well and takes shelter in a cave on a remote mountain top. He forms a close relationship with the local family that is providing for him, most especially the daughter.
This movie is enjoyable without being outstanding in any way. It could be good family fare as there is no graphic violence.
Long Day’s Journey Into Night Directed by Sidney Lumet Written by Eugene O’Neill 1962/USA First Company
Repeat viewing/YouTube
[box] “The fog was where I wanted to be. Halfway down the path you can’t see this house. You’d never know it was here. Or any of the other places down the avenue. I couldn’t see but a few feet ahead. I didn’t meet a soul. Everything looked and sounded unreal. Nothing was what it is. That’s what I wanted—to be alone with myself in another world where truth is untrue and life can hide from itself. Out beyond the harbor, where the road runs along the beach, I even lost the feeling of being on land. The fog and the sea seemed part of each other. It was like walking on the bottom of the sea. As if I had drowned long ago. As if I was the ghost belonging to the fog, and the fog was the ghost of the sea. It felt damned peaceful to be nothing more than a ghost within a ghost.” ― Eugene O’Neill, Long Day’s Journey Into Night[/box]
This faithful adaptation of the play is filled with great acting and poetry.
Everyone in the Tyrone family is struggling with an addiction except youngest son Edmund (Dean Stockwell). Ironically, he is the one who is dying. It is a dysfunctional family where every one lies to each other and, more significantly, to themselves. All the men have drinking problems to one degree or another but focus their attention on mother Mary (Katharine Hepburn) who is unsuccessfully struggling to overcome a morphine addiction acquired after giving birth to Edmund. She is lost in the past.
Father James (Ralph Richardson) is a would-be Shakespearean actor who wound up appearing in the same melodrama over and over. Both son Jamie (Jason Robards Jr.) and Edmund resent him mightily for being a tightwad. James spends as little time as possible in the company of his wife.
Jamie acts when he can but spends much of his time boozing and whoring. At the moment though he is doing odd jobs for his father. He is quite the cynic. The story takes place from morning to deep in the night of the day in which Edmund is to receive his diagnosis.
The film is a verbatim performance of the play which Lumet opened up somewhat to work cinematically. It takes place over the course of a single day. All the performances are wonderful, with Hepburn managing to trump the others including my beloved Ralph Richardson. She is both radiant and tragic at once. It’s a depressing story with no resolution but still well worth seeing. Highly recommended.
I’ve been a classic movie fan for many years. My original mission was to see as many movies as I could get my hands on for every year from 1929 to 1970. I have completed that mission.
I then carried on with my chronological journey and and stopped midway through 1978. You can find my reviews of 1934-1978 films and “Top 10” lists for the 1929-1936 and 1944-77 films I saw here. For the past several months I have circled back to view the pre-Code films that were never reviewed here.
I’m a retired Foreign Service Officer living in Indio, California. When I’m not watching movies, I’m probably traveling, watching birds, knitting, or reading.
Photographs and videos found in this blog, unless indicated, are not owned by me and are here only for the purpose of education and discussion. Media found here are not intended for any commercial purpose. Copyright infringement is not intended.
Written material belongs to me and is copyrighted by flickersintime.com