Daily Archives: February 11, 2016

Richard III (1955)

Richard III
Directed by Laurence Olivier
from the play by William Shakespeare as adapted by David Garrick and Colley Cibber
1955/UK
London Film Productions
Repeat viewing/Netflix rental

[box] Richard III: Conscience is a word that cowards use.[/box]

Olivier makes a detestable yet somehow seductive Richard and gathers quite the cast around him.

This is the Shakespeare play with a few insertions from the Henry VI plays for exposition. The time is at the tail end of the Wars of the Roses which pitted the House of York against the House of Lancaster.  Richard’s brother King Edward IV (Cedric Hardwicke) sits on the throne of England.  Richard is determined to get the crown. His other brother, the Duke of Clarence (John Gielgud),  and Edward’s two young sons stand in his way.  Richard’s first step is to seduce Anne (Claire Bloom), widow of the Lancastrian Prince of Wales.  He accomplishes this despite having killed both her father and her brother.

Richard becomes best buddies with his cousin the equally ruthless Duke of Buckingham (Ralph Richardson).  He then convinces Edward to have Clarence executed for treason. On his sickbed, Edward pardons his brother but Richard intercepts the message and has Clarence murdered.  This treachery kills Edward.  Next is to rid himself of the two little princes.  We follow the bloody story and Richard takes the throne.  But Henry Tudor, the Earl of Richmond, is waiting in the wings to become Henry VII, Queen Elizabeth’s grandfather, thus finally ending the War of the Roses.

This is a handsome production with some superb Shakespearian acting.  Richard’s villainy knew no limits!  Anyone who enjoyed Olivier’s other two Shakespeare films, Henry V and Hamlet, would surely enjoy this.

Laurence Olivier was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Actor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-P0xHwjxiI

Trailer

The Mad Masters (1955)

The Mad Masters (Les maîtres fou)
Directed by Jean Rouch
Les Films de la Pleiade
First viewing/YouTube

 

[box] Personally, I am violently opposed to film crews…. The ethnologist alone, in my mind, is the one who knows when, where, and how to film, i.e. to do the production. Finally, and this is doubtless the decisive argument, the ethnologist should spend quite a long time in the field before undertaking the least bit of film making. This period of reflection, of learning, of mutual understanding might be extremely long, but such a stay is incompatible with the schedules and salaries of a team of technicians. — Jean Rouch[/box]

The best thing about this documentary is that it lasts only 25 minutes.  I found it very distressing.

Documentary filmmaker Jean Rouch takes his camera to Accra, Ghana where we see Africans laboring in the busy city to support “colonial oppression”.  Some of these men gather every day at noon.  On the weekends they transition from modern workers to become Haukas.

The men have constructed their version of the white colonial world with a makeshift governor’s palace and idol of the governor.  The ritual consists of going into a frenzied trance in which their bodies are occupied by caricature versions of the colonial powers such as the governor, a doctor, his wife etc.  During the trance, the men foam at the mouth and stagger around.  They begin to mutilate themselves.  The high point is the sacrifice and consumption of a dog.  Yuck.

I am nothing if not a completist and I found this 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die film on YouTube.  I wish I had died before I saw it.  When I watch things like this I can’t help suspecting that the filmmaker is somehow egging the subjects on. I’m also not quite sure about the political construct Rouch has overlaid the film with.