Daily Archives: July 21, 2013

Things to Come (1936)

Things to Come
Directed by William Cameron Menzies
1936/UK
London Film Productions

First viewing
#102 of 1001 Movies You Must See Before You Die

 

[box] Raymond Passworthy: Oh, God, is there ever to be any age of happiness? Is there never to be any rest?[/box]

I have mixed feelings about this lavish but heavy-handed anti-war science fiction yarn.

The story begins in Everytown (evidently London) at Christmas, 1940.  The population is blithely celebrating while the headlines scream warnings of war and John Cabal (Raymond Massey) worries that another war will destroy civilization.  Suddenly the air raid sirens go off and an unprovoked aerial bombardment and gas attack of the city begins.  The enemy is unnamed.

A montage follows the war through its conclusion in 1966.  By 1970, the people of Everytown are living in medieval conditions.  A plague spread by enemy bombs causes a fatal contagious “Wandering Sickness” to break out.  A man becomes The Boss (Ralph Richardson) by insisting that sufferers be shot.  He consolidates power by continuing war against his neighbors.

John Cabal has gone on to become the leader of a technocracy in the Mediterranean called Wings of the World.  Cabal visits Everytown in his modern airplane, vowing to “cleanup” the city if it does not forsake war.  The Boss imprisons him.  The Boss cannot conceive of the might of Cabal’s organization or its “peace gas.”

Fast forward to 2036, when people live in sleek underground cities and prepare for space travel.  Scientists must still face the forces of reaction and jingoism in the form of Theotocopulos (Cedric Hardwicke) who incites the masses to revolt against any further progress.

Director Menzies was much better known as an art director and the design of this film (by Vincent Korda) is certainly striking.  His work with actors was not as successful.  Much of H.G. Wells’s dialogue sounds like it is being read from a book of speeches and the usually reliable Massey and Hardwicke are not able to do much with it.  Only Richardson manages to bring life to his character.  His Boss is a foolish bombastic bully and a lot of fun.

As usual with H.G. Wells’s material, I had a hard time following the logic.  This is supposed to be an anti-war story and yet the beginning of the war in the film would seem to be an argument for a strong army of defense.  “Peace gas” also seems oxymoronic.

This is a unique film and prescient of the catastrophe that was to overtake Europe a year earlier than predicted by the story.  I’m glad I saw it but I don’t see any reason to revisit it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1w3dpKBuVw

Trailer

 

The Crime of Monsieur Lange (1936)

The Crime of Monsieur Lange (“Le crime de Monsieur Lange”)
Directed by Jean Renoir
1936/France
Films Óberon

Repeat viewing

 

[box] “A director makes only one movie in his life. Then he breaks it up and makes it again.” ― Jean Renoir[/box]

Jean Renoir made three films in 1936.  This one is a well-acted political piece with witty dialogue by the great Jacques Prévert, better known for his work with Marcel Carne, including in Children of Paradise.

It is 1901.  Hapless Amédéé Lange (René Lefévre – Le Million) and his girlfriend Valentine (Florelle) are taken to an inn near the Belgian border, which they hope to cross in the morning.  The patrons of the inn soon recognize Lange as a wanted murderer.  Valentine says they can turn him in if they still want to after hearing his story.

Lange worked for a debt-ridden publishing house owned by the crooked, lecherous Batala (Jules Berry).  In his spare time, he wrote a kind of Western/fantasy serial called “Arizona Jim”.  Batala tricks Lange into signing over the rights and then uses the serial to advertise a quack medicine.  Batala also leeches money from anyone gullible enough to give it to him and seduces and/or rapes innocent girls.

Finally Batala’s debts catch up with him and he feels forced to leave town.  He is believed dead after a train wreck that left many unidentifiable victims.  The workers at the publishing house form a cooperative with the support of an idealistic creditor.  “Arizona Jim” is a big hit and everyone is happy.  Then Batala reappears on the scene.

The movie is directed with a very light hand despite its heavy sounding plot.  It is clearly a polemic in support of a worker’s revolution, however.  So some of the subtlety and humanism characteristic of Renoir is absent in order to make its villain thoroughly bad. Nonetheless, I would rate this in the top tier of Renoir’s films.  The dialogue is thoroughly enjoyable and the acting is very good, particularly that of Berry who makes a charming but despicable villain.

The film is not easily available on DVD in the U.S.  I watched it on Amazon Watch Instant.