The Man Who Would Be King (1975)

The Man Who Would Be King
Directed by John Huston
Written by John Huston and Gladys Hall from a story by Rudyard Kipling
1972/UK/US
IMDb page
Repeat viewing/Amazon Prime Rental

Daniel Dravot: In any place where they fight, a man who knows how to drill men can always be a King. We shall go to those parts and say to any King we find – “D’you want to vanquish your foes?’ and we will show him how to drill men; for that we know better than anything else. Then we will subvert that King and seize his Throne and establish a Dynasty.

John Huston shows his continued mastery of the craft in this well-acted and written adventure set during the British Raj.

The setting is colonial India.  Scoundrels Daniel Dravnot (Sean Connery) and Peachy Carnahan have finished their service in Her Majesty’s army.  They consider that India is “too small” and decide the pickings will be richer in another country.  And they have one in mind – Kafiristan – an isolated mountainous land which last saw white men when Alexander the Great came to call.

Danny cooks up a scheme to extort the money needed to purchase 20 rifles and smuggle them to Kafiristan. The pair will use these to train a small army of locals to defeat village after village on their way to see the religious leader of the country.

Danny’s schemes get more and more dangerous.  Drunk with power, he makes a few mistakes.  Peachy is loyal to his friend throughout.  With Saeed Jaffrey as an interpreter/side kick and Christopher Plummer as Rudyard Kipling.  The gorgeous Shakira (Mrs. Michael) Caine has a non-speaking part as Sean Connery’s intended bride.

This movie is great fun.  There’s plenty of exciting action, the dialogue crackles, and no expense was spared on production values.  Sean Connery is particularly good.  Recommended.

The Man Who Would Be King was nominated for Academy Awards in the categories of Best Writing, Screenplay Adapted From Other Material; Best Art Direction-Set Decoration; Best Costume Design; and Best Film Editing.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Thom Cook
Thom Cook
5 years ago

I love this film! Huston’s first choice was Gable & Bogart which would have been interesting, then Newman & Redford which simply wouldn’t work, then he waited for Connery & Caine which was ABSOLUTE PERFECTION! I can’t wait to which this again for the 20th time.

tom j jones
tom j jones
5 years ago

Awesome film – such a beautiful piece of cinema. One of the peaks of Connery’s career. He and Caine really click. I love Jaffrey in this film – a genuine character who gets to be funny, rather than just a servant. Never forgotten the ending, either.

Do you know the idea of the distinction between a ‘film’ and a ‘movie’? A film is meant primarily as a work of art, or at least a cinematic style – a movie is something you eat popcorn to. This works as both.

It’s also a coruscating metaphor for imperialism – at first, they’re just in it for the loot, and then the power begins to go to their heads. Sounds familiar lol

SJHoneywell
5 years ago

This is very much a “Boy’s Own Adventure” type of film, except for the ending. It is great fun, though. Connery is great, but it’s Caine’s moments at the end that seem to resonate most with me.

dfordoom
dfordoom
4 years ago

One of my all-time favourite movies. I’ve watched it so many times. John Huston was incredibly lucky that he didn’t get to make this movie earlier.